{"id":20518,"date":"2016-05-25T10:22:45","date_gmt":"2016-05-25T09:22:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/essentiallypop.com\/epop\/?p=20518"},"modified":"2016-05-25T10:31:02","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T09:31:02","slug":"the-labourer-is-worthy-of-their-wages-why-artists-shouldnt-give-it-away","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/essentiallypop.com\/epop\/2016\/05\/the-labourer-is-worthy-of-their-wages-why-artists-shouldnt-give-it-away\/","title":{"rendered":"Labourers Are Worthy Of Their Wages: Why We Will No Longer Write For Free"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Wages\"<\/h4>\n

There’s been a lot in the media lately about Sainsbury’s asking artists to volunteer their skills to decorate the\u00a0cafeteria in their Camden store, in exchange for “experience in the creative industry”. In other words, work for free, make a piece of art, for Sainsbury’s, purely for the love of it. For the joy. For the warmth that fills your heart. For the art.<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The resulting backlash against this seemingly innocent enough idea was phenomenal – and spread worldwide. Twitter trended #payartists<\/a>, and many people asked Sainsbury’s if they’d be willing to offer free food; others were offended by the fact that they as artists are expected to pay for the goods and services they get from Sainsbury’s, and yet, here was\u00a0Sainsbury’s expecting the same for free.<\/p>\n

\"Exposure<\/a><\/p>\n

It’s an interesting insight into how “business” sees “art”: art – and by this we’re including all the arts – dance, music, painting, sculpture, writing – is seen as something one does for a hobby, that’s done as a leisure activity, that’s done for fun, or for pleasure. It’s not\u00a0taken seriously, it’s not valued in terms of money, it’s expected that the artist gets enough reward in the very act of making the art.<\/p>\n

i-D<\/a> put it well:<\/p>\n

\n

“Most people who ask creative sorts to work for free probably don’t even think of it as an issue. To them, it’s just a thing in the world that happens. People seem happy enough to do it. What’s the problem? This acceptance is something we internalise and disseminate amongst ourselves, making it harder for us to ask for money, in turn making it more acceptable not to pay – and on it goes.”<\/p>\n

“The struggle to value our art is also hindered by the supposed truths that filter down to us. ‘Work’ is a thing that is hard and thankless and unpleasant, right? If you enjoy it, or even – woah – find it easy<\/em> in that delicious ‘flow state’ way, which germinates all the best creative work and generates some of the most powerful positivity in the world… then it can’t really be work, and therefore it’s not worth money. And ‘art’ is that silly thing that you get to do at school once you’ve drunk your milk and done your maths – surely you’re lucky to get to do it at all, and the pleasure is payment enough?”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

And sure enough – there is reward in\u00a0the\u00a0making of art. There is reward in writing, in dancing, in making and playing music. But just like “serious working people” with “proper jobs”, artists also have to\u00a0make some money. We have bills to pay, we have rent or mortgages, we have families. We need to buy food.<\/p>\n

And it is hard to put a value on our art – we will invariably under-sell ourselves, thinking that nobody could possibly appreciate it in quite the same way as we do. And this goes for\u00a0all artists – “we’re just a new band”; “we’re just a new blog”; “we’re just starting out”. But why? Look back in history and you’ll see the entertainer was a vital part of society, and paid accordingly. The storyteller was a revered and venerated member of the tribe; the travelling musician was feted and repaid handsomely;\u00a0jesters had a place in the royal court. People still want and need to be entertained – and yet something has happened which means the role of the artist is now of less value.<\/p>\n

At Essentially Pop our entire remit has always been, and shall continue to be, that good music deserves to be heard. All artists and genres have fans, and so we make every effort to write positively about everyone we cover, with our particular focus being the independent artist. We’ve recently broadened our scope to include film as well, but our remit remains the same. Positive articles, with a focus on the independent.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We believe our work to be of value. To be worthy of repayment. We are freelance writers – which means that we support ourselves with our writing – for money. Not for free. Among our writers are musicians and students, as well as journalists. Each article takes a minimum of two hours to write – often quite a lot more, especially when there’s research into the artist involved, or questions to be asked, or interviews to be had, or gigs to attend.\u00a0Many of our writers write about\u00a0gigs that they’ve paid for out of their own pocket, and have had to pay to get to.<\/p>\n

We have one full time employee – Lisa, our editor – who puts in a minimum of eight hours per day – 7 days a week. She reads all the emails, edits articles, writes her own articles (interviews, reviews etc), maintains the website, social media, and makes the Youtube videos. It’s more than a full time job, particularly when faced with the demands from people wanting articles written *now* (or preferably before).<\/p>\n

Essentially Pop believes in giving a quality service. But the time has come where we have to put our collective feet down and say enough. As of 1 August, certain conditions will come into play.<\/strong><\/p>\n